Speak for those without a voice

The City of Pasadena is in the process of developing an Urban Forest Management Plan (with the amusing acronym of UFMP or U-FuMP) which will greatly affect the way Pasadena manages its trees. All are encouraged to participate. Please take a few minutes to fill the short online survey. You don’t have to write in any comments, though that is the best way to express your support for trees. Pasadena’s tree plan will set an influential precedent for surrounding communities, including Altadena and La Canada Flintridge.
Urban Forest Management Plan 10 Question Survey:
will be available through Tuesday, Feb. 17, 2015.
Find the survey announcement and upcoming Urban Forestry Advisory Committee meeting info. (11 Feb, 6pm)  below. Also copied below are important tree survey questions along with my own answers. You may share similar concerns, or a very different perspective, or other ideas? The important thing is to participate before the survey ends on 17 February 2015 so that Pasadena will have broad input from which to update its policies regarding trees.
Thanks for your involvement! Trees cannot speak for themselves; therefore, we must speak on their behalf.
The denuded, scarred branches of this once beautiful old mulberry tree tell the tale of multiple, bad “lollipop” pruning, which may someday kill the tree.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 30, 2015 #006-15
News Media Contact:
Delana Gbenekama

626) 744-4748

dgbenekama@cityofpasadena.net

Assistant Public Information Officer
City Manager’s Office
PUBLIC INVITED TO SHARE INPUT ON PASADENA TREES 
THROUGH FEB. 17, 2015
 
PASADENA, Calif.—City residents, businesses and visitors are encouraged to complete a short online survey to help the Department of Public Works gauge public opinion on the importance of Pasadena’s urban forest.
The 10-question survey:
will be available through Tuesday, Feb. 17, 2015.
 

This survey is an initial step in the development of an Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP). Community input is instrumental in shaping Pasadena’s public tree polices and will be included as an essential component of the UFMP. Pasadena Public Works has retained local environmental firm Dudek to update and consolidate Pasadena’s public tree management practices, tree protection guidelines, and tree ordinance information into one document called the Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP).

_______________
Pasadena Public Works & Dudek will present information about the Urban Forestry Management Plan components
6 p.m. Wednesday, Feb. 11, 2015
at the 
Urban Forestry Advisory Committee (UFAC) meeting
City Yards, 233 W. Mountain St., Room 210-220, second floor.

_______________

 
The public will have the opportunity to provide feedback about public tree issues.  The UFAC agenda will be posted online, www.cityofpasadena.net/PublicWorks/Urban-Forestry-Advisory-Committee, by 5 p.m. Thursday, Feb. 5, 2015.
- – -
 
Stump of the once magnificent shade tree that Vroman’s (Joel Sheldon) wanted cut down because it blocked the remodeled store’s sign. How is the “worth” of an 80 year old, healthy tree calculated and for who’s benefit?

Excerpts from the City of Pasadena Tree Survey: Important Questions with Sample Answers by L. Paul
 
Please do NOT cut and paste any of the following text into your survey. Feel free to paraphrase, but use your own words. You may have different ideas and concerns or other criteria to share. In any case, please participate! 
 
4. If you could add criteria to the Tree Protection Ordinance (TPO) for tree removal what would it be and how would you define it? 

There is insufficient notification to the public when a particular tree is threatened with a request for removal. Mature trees are valued by passersby, shoppers, residents, those waiting at bus stops under the tree’s shade, even drivers who admire a tree’s beauty on a commute; however, if a request for removal is filed with the City and comes before UFAC, few of those who care for a tree know it may be cut down and why. Then, suddenly, there is shock, anger and sadness when a beloved tree is unexpectedly cut down. By then, it is too late to speak up for the tree, which may be half a century or more old and part of local memories. There needs to be more public notification of requests to remove mature trees so that those who care for a particular tree have an opportunity to oppose (or, in rare cases, to support) its destruction.

As policies stands, UFAC accepts public input, but only when notice about a tree has been “leaked” by a concerned neighbor, found out some way by accident, or otherwise haphazardly made public knowledge. If the Tree Protection Ordinance is to work, then there needs to be website information about permit requests as well as advanced notice posted near the tree so that everyone knows about plans to remove that tree, why the removal is thought necessary, and by whom. Sometimes, when a shop owner or the City or whomever decides to remove a tree due to some problem, that problem can be solved or mitigated creatively without cutting down the tree. More ideas can be explored if more citizens are allowed to suggest alternatives.

6. Do you think the Master Street Tree Plan (MRST) needs to be updated? [ YES ] If so, what would you change?
 
Identifying street tree species for parkways and streets is fine and often leads to attractive “themed” appearance; however, rigidly adhering to old plans, such as the Pasadena Playhouse District’s outdated, 15 year old “streetscape” plan that removed existing big trees (80 year old Indian Laurel Figs) to plant tiny gingkos and Mexican fan palms (now classified as an invasive species) is not acceptable. So-called “streetscape” tree plans should be revisited every 5 years and remain flexible enough to NOT require the removal of grand old trees without public survey or input. Even if a particular tree species was planted long ago and is no longer considered optimal for street use, the value of a large, mature tree is far greater than the “twig” saplings that replace them. Also, unnecessary removal of a large, old tree is very costly for the City. Never forget that mature trees are living things with many benefits. They are not merely an unfashionable park bench or trash can that can simply be discarded and replaced.
7. In your neighborhood, are there any areas where more trees should be planted? (Name the streets or areas) 
 
The dwindling of trees in parking lots is a blight in the City. When I was a child, parking lots had strips of soil between the rows of parking spaces that contained narrow hedges, flowering shrubs, and trees were interspersed so that their canopies provided contiguous, very welcome shade over parked cars along the strip on hot days, as well as nest sites for small birds and welcome beauty. These days, shoppers who come to spend money in the City are lucky if a tiny crepe myrtle or some tiny sapling tree gets planted in a parking lot, usually in a barren, minuscule tree well surrounded by cement or baking asphalt. Notice how we all try to get the one or two parking spaces under the pathetic shade provided the handful of small trees in most current parking lots.
Developers no longer wish to pay for the care of even drought-resistant trees on their commercial properties. Trees and flowers may take up few parking spaces, after all! And need water. And their leaves, flowers, fronds, cones and acorns must be swept up. Even when there are trees in a parking lot, there are too few of them and the species selected are invariably small in size. Worse, tree care in parking lots usually consists of periodic “lollipop” pruning of branches so the tree casts no shade. For example, there used to be beautiful, drought-resistant, yellow flowering palo verde trees in the open air shopping center at 3415 East Foothill Blvd (for Bed Bath & Beyond; Ross; Best Buy; PetSmart, etc.). Those palo verdes grew high, with lovely green bark, and wide, open shade canopies that shoppers could park under… That is, until an inept “tree service” began chopping off all their sturdy limbs, over and over again, until the poor “poodle-ized” trees developed giant balls of woody scar tissue on the ends of all their main branches. A year or so later, all those expensive, lovely desert trees were chopped down and replaced with what appear to be tiny camphor trees that will not offer significant shade to much of the sun-baked lot for many years to come.
Pasadena should require developers to plant more trees in hot, asphalt parking lots; trees that will reduce heat-island effect, provide shade for parking spaces, and attract shoppers. Such trees should be native species that require little water and care. Larger trees should be planted, not just small “crap myrtles” (as many call them). The pruning of parking lot trees should be supervised by the City to assure the health of such trees by preventing “hack” maintenance. Landlords waste a phenomenal amount of money on men with chainsaws and blowers instead of paying for qualified arborist services.
9. What are you willing to support to ensure Pasadena’s trees are maintained and protected for future generations? (Check all that apply)
 
Pasadena needs immediate emergency funding to address emergent, deadly foreign diseases that are infesting and killing numerous city and private trees. For example, the devastating Polyphagous Shot Hole Borer (a tiny beetle that introduces fungal disease into a tree’s vascular system) is infesting and killing many tree species in the City, yet very little has been done to identify all the affected trees or to assist private landowners with the treatment of heritage oaks, for example, or the removal of dangerous trees attacked by PSHB. Worse, the City has no policy nor enforcement effort to stop private owners and tree services from removing contagious trees and spreading the PSHB through infested wood dumped on site, at landfills, or cut and transported elsewhere for firewood. Failing to properly chip and “solarize” (heat under plastic) downed trees and firewood cut from “sick” trees is rapidly spreading the fungi introduced by the borer. Tree services also spread the deadly, insect-borne fungi by failing to sterilize their blades and other tools and the climbing spikes some “tree trimmers” still use.
Pasadena and the surrounding mountains *may* lose as much as 30% of its trees just to PSHB if nothing is done swiftly… and this does not take other serious tree diseases into consideration, such as the Foamy Canker in so many old, native oaks! Pasadena needs to act now, though it may already be too late, to fund experts to investigate PSHB and other botanical diseases, to explore treating affected trees, to educate tree owners, and to require (and enforce) compliance by tree owners and all tree services with regulations that will limit, or at least slow, the spread of deadly tree infestations. Private landowners who want to help often cannot afford the thousands of dollars it takes to remove an infested tree and treat its wood. Many tree services know about PSHB, but they refuse to “waste” time cleaning their equipment or to take the time and money necessary to properly handle infested wood.
The City itself, along with L. A. County, has spread PSHB and other tree diseases by dumping infested trees blown over in wind storms in City County yards, then allowing anyone to cut firewood from the pile of contagious trees. The borers radiated out from such mass “tree dumps” into surrounding neighborhoods and wild areas where now old native oaks, sycamores, alders and so many other trees are sick and dying in large numbers. Please take action! How can Pasadena be a Tree City if it fails to act and lets so many of its large, old trees die of invasive disease?
Secondly, Pasadena needs to do something about the inadequate size (and sometimes the total lack) of tree wells around the trunks of its unirrigated street trees. Trees need water to survive. Rain falls from a tree’s leaves out to the edge of its canopy (drip line). Many of Pasadena’s old trees are in asphalt or cement right up to their trunks. In some places, old trees grow buttress roots right over the concrete! Frequently, there are complaints about trees lifting sidewalks and invading leaking pipes and sewers (if the pipes were not leaking, the tree would not sense water, of course). Roots often lift sidewalks and invade pipes in a desperate search for needed water. The tiny tree wells (squares of soil) around street tree trunks… often covered with obstructive, decorative metal covers… are insufficient to keep trees healthy. They promote roots that buckle sidewalks. Next thing you know, the City or property owner wants to remove the tree due to “sidewalk hazard.”
Over time, Pasadena needs to gradually revise its sidewalks to remove the cement sections around trees so that street trees can capture more water and enable root systems to “breathe.” The native oak plantings near City Hall where there is a linear strip of decomposed granite soil around the trees between parking spaces and the sidewalk is a much better way to keep street trees healthy! Trees cost money. Even removal of trees killed due to insufficient water or disease requires a great deal of money to remove. It makes economic sense for Pasadena to design ways to improve tree wells and reduce the extent of concrete alongside pedestrian walkways. Street trees are exposed to car exhaust, polluting dust, hot sun with little rain. At the least, Pasadena should expand current tree wells so that the area’s limited rainfall can help keep valuable trees alive.
11. Please provide any additional comments and suggestions for tree planting and care in the City of Pasadena. 
 
Old, mature trees take a lifetime to grow. Too often such venerable trees are capriciously removed by business owners who don’t want to pick up a broom to sweep leaves or jacaranda flower petals… or who don’t want their signs blocked (such as the owner of Vromans!)… or who have leaky old sewer connections that they don’t want to fix, so they complain about invading tree roots “forcing” them to repair their sewer pipes (such as the owner of Vromans!)… etc.  When a century old tree is cut down, there needs to be very good reason and public support for such action, because children will be born and grow old before another mature tree ever graces that site again. Tiny saplings and little potted trees are not sufficient compensation for what is chopped down.
The multiple benefits of trees to the City needs to be better acknowledged. Mature trees are one answer to global warming. Large trees provide urban habitat for small wildlife, such as birds and butterflies. Their majesty and beauty increases property values and improves the health of Pasadena residents and visitors. As such, trees need to be given higher priority and better protection than they are currently given. Thank you for this opportunity to comment.
- – -
Many of us recall the beautiful, healthy 80 year old trees on Colorado Blvd. that were cut down by Pasadena during Jan – Feb 2009 without approval of the Urban Forestry Advisory Committee (UFAC)… all because of an outdated, 13 year old “streetscape plan” that replaced shade trees with Mexican Fan Palms (now considered an invasive species) and small, sometimes odorous gingko trees. Strong public protest couldn’t save the numerous old trees that were toppled in the night (with active birds’ nests in them). Stronger protection is needed for the “urban forest,” so this sort of loss will not happen again.

Many thanks to Lori Paul!
TAKE THE SURVEY

Now is the time for law

Dianne Patrizzi:

And now there is a law suit.

Thanks so much.

You had to push us to this.

I know, change is hard.

Your plan sucks.

You don’t listen.

To donate to the cause:

http://www.savehahamongna.org/lawsuitdonate.htm

Because, yeah.

You just don’t listen to reason.

Originally posted on Dianne Patrizzi:

December 16, 2013, the Pasadena City Council amazes. Here are video highlights from that meeting.

Victor Gordo makes sane and reverent comment on the subject of Hahamongna. What a beautiful way to turn it around. Mr. Gordo said he favors the slower and smaller approach to Los Angeles CountyPublic Works Sediment Management Draft EIR,  an alternative proffered by Tim Brick. :::

Margaret McAustin wants the position to be much stronger … strongest possible language. The City of Pasadena assert their legal ownership and rights.  All agree.  :::

Public Comment:

Audubon Society of Pasadena

Pasadena Sierra Club

Pasadena Environmental Advisory Commission

Friends of Hahamongna

Arroyo Seco Foundation

Lori Paul

Tim Martinez

Linda Klibanow

LOVE

View original

Bike Commute Diaries: An Up Close & Personal Look

Originally posted on One woman. Many bicycles.:

For over two years I’m shared snippets of my everyday life in the Bike Commute Diaries series. Now, thanks to a local reporter writing a story on the future of bikes on Caltrain, you can follow me on a typical morning commute, hyperlapsed from about 60 minutes into four fast minutes. The video captures everything I love about my commute: relaxing on the train, popping into a coffee shop for a latte to go, cruising down the banks of the Guadalupe River, and chatting with friends I’ve met along the way. Thank you, Caltrain, for making it possible.

For more on the future of bikes on Caltrain, read the full story from the Peninsula Press.

About the Bike Commute Diaries: Launched in May 2012 for National Bike Month, this series explores the unexpected and surprising things I’ve seen and learned while bicycling for transportation.

View original

“Impacts would be less than significant”

Originally posted on +:

Dear Friends,

Like some kind of a nut, I read the Green Hotel Apartments Draft EIR, Section 3.1 last night. Sweating in 102 degree heat, swatting at mosquitos while plotz’d-out on my back porch, a crow’s flap away from the Green mothership herself.

“I don’t know what the big deal is… it’s just a 75 foot high, 76,980 sq. ft. addition butted up to a National Historic Landmark. It won’t even be noticeable.”

The report is peppered with the phrase “Impacts would be less than significant” but it is the photographs and the photo-simulations of what is claimed to be “less than significant” that shock me. For instance, here is a photograph of a before and after taken from one of my favorite and most photographed vantage points because of its unique view of the western turret. As you can see in the after… turret is GONE. 

beforeafter3.1-6

Then, to spit in the eye of my eye-candy, this paragraph describes…

View original 174 more words

It’s Tax Deductible!

Dianne Patrizzi:

I plan on being there and have already purchased my tickets. I don’t think they’ll have many at the gate…. unless I go early.

Originally posted on +:

Come tour the Castle Green apartments and be entertained June 6, 2014.

CASTLE GREEN WELCOMES THE PUBLIC TO AN EVENING TOUR

Here’s the deets:

WHAT:

Moonlight at the Castle – Tour and Janet Klein Concert in Ballroom

WHERE:

Castle Green – 99 S. Raymond Ave. Pasadena, CA

WHEN:

Friday, June 6, 5:00 – 9:00pm; Janet Klein performance after 7:30pm

COST: 

$40 per person; advance tickets on sale at http://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/660157

or by mailing a check to: 

Friends of the Castle Green  

99 S. Raymond Ave. #401 Pasadena, CA 91105.

~~~Tickets may be purchased evening of–if available.

(price includes light refreshments, tour and concert ~ No host bar)

ATTIRE: 

Vintage Attire or stylish touches are highly encouraged!

PARKING: 

Suggested parking at meters or Schoolhouse parking structure

janetfan
click on me, baby.

PUBLIC MAY CONTACT:

Susan Futterman (626) 824-8482

FriendsoftheCastleGreen@gmail.com

 

View original

+

The Friends of the Castle Green is a California Charitable Organization dedicated to sustainable historic restoration of the Castle Green Hotel

GENERAL.LA : STARCHITEQ STUDIO

"Sharpening The Cutting Edge"

DIANA BELCHASE

ESCAPE TO HER WORLD OF BOOKS, SPIES, AND BEHIND THE SCENES D.C.

Gas station without pumps

musings on life as a university professor

Define Normal

The Quest to Find the Land of Normal

No Big Dig!

We need the help and support of the entire community to protect Hahamongna

The Dangerously Truthful Diary of a Sicilian Housewife

An English woman in Sicily handling parenthood, corruption and a Sicilian mother-in-law, all at once

Vincit Omnia Veritas

Truth Conquers All

recyclewater

Just another WordPress.com site

Treeblogging.com

a forest of arboreal links

Mariposa Creamery

A project of Mariposa Industries, Altadena, CA

One woman. Many bicycles.

Rides in heels, speeds down hills, splashes in puddles and stays out well past dark.

LADOT Bike Blog

LADOT - Have fun while traveling, ride a bike!

My Life with Tommy

The trials and tribulations with the pit bull mix named Tommy Lee Jones, so named because he possesses a striking resemblance to the actor.

L.A. Creek Freak

towards healthy Southern California streams, creeks, rivers and neighborhoods

The Edge of Europe

"Dimmi chi escludi e ti dirò chi sei" - Don Andrea Gallo

Matt on Not-WordPress

Stuff and things.

Downtown Pasadena Neighborhood Association

The voice of Residents in the Central District of Pasadena, California

Boyonabike!

Life beyond the automobile in Southern California

lariverflyfishing

Fishing for carp, waiting for steelhead

Pasadena Adjacent

Life Lived on the Edge of Pasadena

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,578 other followers

%d bloggers like this: